Courts prioritize fairness and copyright fundamental rights even though respecting the autonomy of educational institutions. Around the aforesaid proposition, we've been guided with the decision on the Supreme Court within the case of Khyber Medical University and others v. Aimal Khan and others, PLD 2022 Supreme Court ninety two. 9. The aforesaid exceptions are lacking from the present case. In such circumstances, this petition is found to get not maintainable and is particularly dismissed accordingly with pending application (s). Read more
ninety three . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming on the main case, It's also a properly-recognized proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is topic to your procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings on the evidence.
Google Scholar – an unlimited database of state and federal case legislation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
Subscription access exclusively for organizations/businesses (SCC ID essential) to criminal and traffic case information within the general district courts with the purpose of confirming an individual’s date of birth.
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming towards the main case, It is additionally a well-established proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is subject to the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to get more info arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.
Free case legislation sites in Pakistan are invaluable resources for anyone needing to understand Pakistani law. By utilizing the guidelines and techniques outlined in this article, you could navigate these resources effectively and conduct thorough legal research.
Some pluralist systems, which include Scots law in Scotland and types of civil regulation jurisdictions in Quebec and Louisiana, do not exactly healthy into the dual common-civil law system classifications. These types of systems may well have been closely influenced from the Anglo-American common legislation tradition; however, their substantive legislation is firmly rooted during the civil legislation tradition.
This ruling has conditions, and For the reason that petitioners failed a qualifying Examination, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based about the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above mentioned facts and circumstances with the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 with the Constitution. Read more
VI) The petitioner is at the rear of the bars considering that arrest, investigation in the case is complete, he is no more essential for the purpose of investigation and at this stage to maintain him behind the bars before summary of trial will serve no handy purpose.
The DCFS social worker in charge of the boy’s case had the boy made a ward of DCFS, and in her 6-month report for the court, the worker elaborated about the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to maneuver him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.
Post arrest bail Granted, U/S 302 PPC, charge of conspiracy and ent couldn't be proved Unless of course case is tried(Bail Matters)
A coalition of residents sent a letter of petition to your Supreme Court to challenge the Water and Power Growth Authority’s (WAPDA) construction of an electricity grid station in their neighborhood, on designated “green belt” property. The Court listened to the matter to be a human rights case, as Article 184 (three) on the Pakistan Constitution provides unique jurisdiction towards the Supreme Court to take up and determine any matter concerning the enforcement of fundamental rights of public importance.
In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials acting within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case legislation previously rendered on similar cases.